Simulasi Penyusunan Indeks Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Berkualitas

Hermada Dekiawan, Ronowati Tjandra, Budi Asmarawati, Hasan Subagyo


This study aims to analyze the quality of economic growth in the Solo Raya, which includes Surakarta, Boyolali, Sragen, Wonogiri, Klaten, Sukoharjo, and Karanganyar and compile a simulation of a composite index of quality economic growth. Quality economic growth is an important aspect in national and regional development. The definition of quality economic growth in this study is economic growth followed by an increase in the welfare aspect of society through the fundamental dimension, social dimension, and welfare dimension. Each dimension has several relevant indicators. To compare the quality of economic growth between regions in Solo Raya, each dimension will be compiled into a composite index after going through the normalization and weighting process. This index was developed from the Mlachila, Tapsoba, and Tapsoba (2014) models. Using 2010-2017 data as a simulation, the results show that Wonogiri Regency has the lowest rank while Sukoharjo Regency has the highest rank and Surakarta has second best rank.


quality of economic growth index; composite index; normalization

Full Text:



Adams, R. 2002. Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Findings from a New Data Set. Policy Research Working Paper 2972, World Bank, February 2002.

Barro, Robert J. 2002. “Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth” dalam: Economic Growth: Sources, Trends, and Cycles. Central Bank of Chile.

Benner, Chris dan Manuel Pastor.2016. “Inclusive Economy Indicators: Framework and Indicator Recommendations”. USC Dornsife.

Butkiewicz, James L. and Halit Yanikkaya. 2006. Institutional and Economic Growth: Maintenance of The Rule of Law or Democratic Institutions, or both?. Economic Modelling. Vol. 3. No. 4.

HBhanumurthy and HMitra. 2004. Economic Growth, Poverty, and Inequality in Indian States in the Pre-reform and Reform Periods, Asian Development Review, vol. 21, no. 2

Lin. Bo Q. 2003. Economic Growth, Income Inequality, and Poverty Reduction in People's Republic of China. Asian Development Review, vol. 20, no. 2.

Mlachila, Montfort, Rene Tapsoba, dan Sampawende J. A. Tapsoba. 2014. A Quality of Growth Index for Developing Countries: A Proposal. IMF Working Paper. WP/14/172.

Nawaz, Saima, Nasir Iqbal, and Muhammad Arshad Khan. 2014. The Impact of Intitutional Quality on Economic Growth: Panel Evidence. The Pakistan Development Review. 53:1.

Nguyen, Canh Phuc, Thanh Dinh Su, and Tahi Vu Hong Nguyen. 2016. Institutional Quality and Economic Growth: The Case of Emerging Economis. Theoritical Economics Letters. Vol. 8 No. 11.

Prasetyo, Eko.2008. The Quality of Growth : Peran Teknologi dan Investasi Human Capital Sebagai Pemacu Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Berkualitas.. JEJAK, Volume 1, Nomor 1, September, 2008

Ravallion, M dan S Chen .1997. What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?. World Bank Economic Review. Vol. 11(2).


Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi
ISSN : 2685-1415 (Online) | 1410-8224 (Print)
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Akademi Akuntansi YKPN Yogyakarta.
Jl. Gagak Rimang No. 2-4 Balapan, Kotak Pos 6417 YKGK 
Phone (0274) 560159, 562317, 513413, 563516 Fax. (0274) 561591 
Yogyakarta 55222

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.