The Framework for and Analysis of Good Corporate Governance Scoring in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): The Substance of Government Policy on Corporate Management

Dian Indri Purnamasari, Roderikus Agus Trihatmoko

Abstract


The current study aims to develop the framework for corporate governance and to assess the corporate governance scoring trend based on R-MBU/2012 in publicly traded SOEs. The study adopts mixed qualitative-quantitative methods. The qualitative method is based on grounded theory and interpreted by way of constructivist approach, whereas the quantitative method uses the technique of descriptive statistics. The data were obtained from R-MBU/2012; the sample consists of 18 SOEs listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. The results identify the relationship between variabilities in the roles of shareholders, the General Meeting of Shareholders, Board of Commissioners (BOC), Board of Directors (BOD), corporate commitment and culture, and information disclosure as the determining indicator of the level of good corporate governance implementation. Five banking companies, 2 manufacturing companies, and 3 companies in service industry are all scored ‘very good’ for the implementation of good corporate governance. However, other companies scored ‘good’, ‘fair’, and ‘poor’, respectively


Keywords


State-owned enterprises (SOEs); Good Corporate Governance (GCG); Government Policy; Analysis of Scoring

References


Akbar, S., J. Poletti-Hughes, R. El-Faitouri, and S.Z.A. Shah, 2016, “More on the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance in the UK: Evidence from the application of generalized method of moments estimation”, Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 417-429.

Al-Kassar, T.A., and M.A. Al-Nidawiy, 2014, “The role of corporate governance and its impact on the share price on industrial corporations listed on the Amman stock exchange”, European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Research, 2(6), 124-144.

Aras, G. and D. Crowther, 2008, “Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability”, Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448.

Arkhipova, T., A. Dibrov, L. Beskrovnaya and A. Shchukina, 2015, “Functions of state-owned corporations in the structure of the public sector of the Russian Federation”, SHS Web Conference, (28). DOI: 10.1051/ SHS 2 shsconf/20162801008

Bushman, R., Q. Chen, E. Engel, and A. Smith, 2004, “Financial accounting information, organizational complexity and corporate governance systems”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2), 167-201.

Bergen, M., S. Dutta and O.C. Walker, Jr., 1992, “Agency relationships in marketing: A review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories”, Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 1-24.

Ciftci, I., E. Tatoglu, G. Wood, M. Demirbag and S. Zaim, 2019, “Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey”, International Business Review, 28(1), 90-103.

Creswell, J.W., 2013, “Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches” (3rd ed., SAGE Publication).

Creswell, J.W., 2009, “Research design. qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches” (Third Edition SAGE Publication). Achmad Fawaid. 2016, “Research design. pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif dan mixed” (Edisi Kelima. Pustaka Pelajar Yogyakarta).

Dobson, W., 2017, “China’s state-owned enterprises and Canada’s foreign direct investment policy”, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary. doi:10.3138/cpp.2017-002

Deschênes, S., M. Rojas, H. Boubacar, B. Prud’homme and A. Ouedraogo, 2015, “The impact of board traits on the social performance of Canadian firms”, Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, 15 (3), 293-305.

Eng, L.L. and Y.T. Mak, 2003, “Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(4), 325-345.

Furqan, A.C., M.I. Abdullah, M. Iqbal and R. Masdar, 2018, “The role of corporate governance on the effect of state ownership on audit findings at state-owned enterprises”, European Research Studies Journal, 21(3), 218-229.

Farhan, A., S.N. Obaid and H. Azlan, 2017, “Corporate governance effect on firms’ performance–evidence from the UAE”, Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 33(1), 66-80.

Fatchan, H.A., 2011, “Metode penelitian kualitatif” (Jenggala Pustaka Utama, Surabaya).

Goel, P., 2018, “Implications of corporate governance on financial performance: an analytical review of governance and social reporting reforms in India”, Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 3(4), 1-21.

Gupta, R.K. and R. Awasthy, 2015, “Qualitative research in management” (SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd., New Delhi).

Hammersly, M., 2013, “What is qualitative research?” (Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., London).

Humphries, S.A. and C. Whelan, 2017, “National culture and corporate governance codes”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(1), 152-163.

Jensen and Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kalu, F.A. and J.C. Bwalya, 2017, “What makes qualitative research good research? An exploratory analysis of critical elements”, International Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 43-56.

Kocmanova, A., J. Hrebicek, and M. Dočekalová, 2011, “Corporate governance and Sustainability”, Economics and Managemnet, 16, 543–550.

Karim, A. and A. Purwanto, 2020, “The relationship between good corporate governance and performance of most liquid stocks in Indonesia”, Research in World Economy, 11(1), 137-142.

Khan, B., A. Nijhof, R.A. Diepeveen, and D.A.M. Melis, 2018, “Does good corporate governance lead to better firm performance? Strategic lessons from a structured literature review”, Corporate Ownership and Control, 15(4), 73-85.

Kloivene, R. and V. Gimžauskiene, 2014, “Performance measurement model formation in state-owned enterprises”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,156, 594-598.

Keputusan Sekretaris Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor 16 Tahun 2012. Indikator/Parameter Penilaian dan Evaluasi Atas Penerapan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik (Good Corporate Governance) Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Salinan, 06 Juni 2012. Sekretaris Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jakarta.

Keputusan Sekretaris Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor: KEP-117/M-MBU/2002 Tahun 2002 . Penerapan Praktek Good Corporate Governance Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara BUMN). Salinan, 31 Juli 2020. Menteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jakarta.

Lukas, S., and B. Basuki, 2015, “The implementation of good corporate governance and its Impact on the financial performance of banking industri listed in IDX”, The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 23(1), 47-72.

López-Quesada, E., M. Camacho-Miñano and S.O. Idowu, 2018, “Corporate governance practices and comprehensive income”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(3), 462-477.

Lukviarman, N. (2016). Corporate governance (Edisi I Cetakan I, Era Adicitra Intermedia, Solo, Indonesia.

Liang, H., B. Ren, and S.L. Sun, 2015, “An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises”, Journal of International Business Studies,46(2), 223-240.

Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 215-241.

Purnamasari, D.I. and H.K.S. Negara, 2020, “The development of trend analysis of scoring for good corporate governance based on the decree of the ministry of state owned enterprises Number SK-16/S.MBU/2012 in state owned banks that went public in the period 2013-2018”, International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications Security, 8(1), 33-39.

Purnamasari, D.I., Rahmawati and Mulyanto, 2016, “Differences in budgetary participation in view of assessment of corporate governance, sector, and the experience of managers in public SOE in Indonesia”, INFORMATION-An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(7/A), 2527-2532.

Peraturan Meteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor: PER-05/MBU/2006.. Komite Audit bagi Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Salinan, 20 Desember 2006. Menteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jakarta.

Peraturan Meteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor 01 Tahun 2011. Penerapan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik (Good Corporate Governance) Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Salinan, 01 Agustus 2011. Menteri Negara Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jakarta.

Rahman and Khatun, 2017, “Quality of corporate governance: a review from the literature”, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(1), 59-66.

Radygin, A., Y. Simachev and R. Entov, 2015, “The state-owned company: “state failure” or “market failure”?”, Russian Journal of Economics, 1, 55–80.

Sanusi, A, 2015, “State owned enterprises (SOEs), the problems and solutions in financial and asset management”, Scholedge International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Allied Studies, 3(2), 19-33.

Trihatmoko, R.A. and Y.S. Susilo, 2018, “The concept of Indonesia Raya Incorporated conforms the constitution of economics: studies of grounded theory on state asset ownership management”, Business and Economic Research, 8(1):136-153.

Trihatmoko, R.A., 2019, “Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Filosofi, teori, desain dan Implementasi” (Publika Global Media, Yogyakarta).

Taylor, S.J., R. Bogdan and M.L DeVault, 2016, “Introduction to qualitative research Methods” (John Wiley and Son, Inc. Canada).

Udin, R.S., K.E. Sudath, and F. Luo, 2016, “Investigating the failure of state-owned enterprises (SOES) of an emerging economy: a comperatibe case study”, Studies in Business and Economics, 11(2):115-129.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomer 40 Tahun 2007. Perseroan Terbatas. 16 Agustus 2007. Lembaran Nagara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106. Jakarta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2003. Badan Usaha Milik Negara. 19 Juni 2003. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 70. Jakarta.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v25i1.417

Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi
ISSN : 2685-1415 (Online) | 1410-8224 (Print)
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Akademi Akuntansi YKPN Yogyakarta.
Jl. Gagak Rimang No. 2-4 Balapan, Kotak Pos 6417 YKGK 
Phone (0274) 560159, 562317, 513413, 563516 Fax. (0274) 561591 
Yogyakarta 55222

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.