IMPLEMENTASI ANGGARAN BERBASIS KINERJA DAN AKUNTABILITAS SEKTOR PUBLIK Studi pada Pemerintah DIY

Enita Binawati

Abstract


The implementation of performance-based budget in Indonesia to materialize the accountability of a local government was influenced by various factors: Based on the survey of the study the objectives its objectives were: (1) to empirically examine the impact of leadership style, resources, information and goal orientation on the implementation of performance-based budget, (2) to empirically examine the impact of the implementation of the performance-based budget on financial and performance accountabilities, (3) to empirically examine the impact of the financial accountability on the performance accountability, and (4) to interpret and to empirically describe mimetic, coercive and normative isomorphism using institutional theory. The survey was conducted to 202 local government officers involved in budgetary preparation and decision making, consisting of five districts/city in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The study used mixed method, which combined qualitative and quantitative approaches and sequential explanatory strategy. The hypotheses were tested using partial least square (PLS) analysis. The results of the survey showed that (1) the factors of the resources, the information and the goal orientation were proven to have significant impact on the implementation of the performance-based budget, (2) the implementation of the performance-based budget was proven to have significant impact on the financial and performance accountabilities, (3) the financial accountability was also proven to have significant impact on the performance accountability, and (4) there was normative and coercive institutional isomorphism in Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD), working units of local government apparatus, of the Special Region of Yogyakarta.

Keywords: the implementation of the performance-based budget, public sector accountability, institutional theory and mixed method.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Achyani, F. dan Cahya, B. T. 2011. Analisis Aspek Rasional dalam Penganggaran Publik terhadap Efektivitas Pengimplementasian Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja pada Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. Maksimum Vol.1, No.1.

Akbar, R., R. Pilcher, dan B. Perrin. 2012. Performance Measurement in Indonesia: The Case of Local Government. Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 24 (3), 262291.

Ashworth, R., G. Boyne., dan R. Delbridge. 2009. Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

Asmadewa, I. 2007. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keefektifan Implementasi Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja: Studi pada Pemerintah Pusat. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Bastian, I. 2010. Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Suatu Pengantar, Edisi 3. Yogyakarta. Erlangga.

Braun, V, dan Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology.

Cavalluzzo, K. S. dan Ittner, Christopher D. 2003. Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol 29.

Cooper, D. R. dan Schindler, P. S. 2006. Metodologi Riset Bisnis, Volume Riset 1 dan 2, Edisi.9. Jakarta. McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Coombs, H. M. dan Jenkins, D. E. 2002. Public Sector Financial Management, Third Edition. South-Western Cengage Learning.

Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (Versi Terjemahan). Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

DiMaggio, P.J. dan W.W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review.

Effendi, T. 2006. Modul Indikator Kinerja: Referensi untuk Menentukan Indikator Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara.

Friedman, M. 2009. Trying Hard Is Not Good Enough. Booksurge.

Frumkin, P. dan J. Galaskiewicz. 2004. Institutional Isomorphism and Public Sector Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

Halim, Abdul. 2007. Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah. Edisi revisi. Yogyakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hartono, Jogiyanto. 2008a. Metodologi Penelitian Sistem Informasi. Edisi I, Andi Offset: Yogyakarta.

. 2008b. Pedoman Survei Kuesioner: Mengembangkan kuesioner, Mengatasi Bias dan Meningkatkan Respon. Edisi I, BPFE: Yogyakarta.

Hartono, Jogiyanto dan Abdillah, Willy. 2009. Konsep dan Aplikasi PLS (Patial Least Square) untuk Penelitian Empiris. BPFE: Yogyakarta.

Hair Jr., J.E., Anderson, R.E., Tatham R.L. & Back, W.C. 2010. Multivariate data Analysis, 7th Ed., New Jersey: PrenticeHall International, Inc.

Izzaty, K.N. 2011. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kualitas Sumber

Daya Manusia terhadap Penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja BLU. Universitas Diponegoro.

Julnes, P. de Lancerand Holzer, M. 2001. Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organization: an Empirical Tudy of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation. Public Administration Review 61 (6), P. 693-708.

Lembaga Adminsitrasi Negara dan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. 2000. Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance. Jakarta hal.1,5.

Mardiasmo, 2002. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi Meyer, J. dan B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology.

Nurhamid, M. 2008. Implementasi Inovasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah. Vol.3, No.3, Hal.45-76.

Nurmawilis, N. 2008. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Tesis. Universitas Sumut Medan.

Parhusip, P.T. 2007. Pengaruh Penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja terhadap Akuntabilitas Publik dan Transparansi Pemerintah Kota/Kabupaten yang Terjadi Pemekaran. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Patton, J.M. 1992. Accountability and Governmental Financial Reporting. Financial Accountability and Management, 8(3).

Putra, H.S. 2006. Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Teknis dan Organisasi terhadap Pengembangan Pengukuran Kinerja dan Penggunaan Informasi Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah: Studi Empiris di Propinsi DIY. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Santoso, U. dan Pambelum, Y. J. 2008. Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah dalam Mencegah Fraud. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis. Vo.4, No.1, Hal.14-33.

Sardjito, B. dan Munthaher, O. 2008. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah: Budaya dan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderating. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol.2, No.1, Hal.37-49.

Scott, W. Richard. 1987. The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 32:493-511.

Soleman, R. 2007. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Penerapan Akuntabilitas Keuangan, dan Ketaatan pada Peraturan Perundangan terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (AKIP). Disertasi. Unpad.

Sinclair, A. 1995. The Chameleon of Accountability: Form and Discourses. Accounting Organization and Society. Vol.20, No.2/3, PP.219-237.

Sriharioto dan Wardhani, R. Good Governance, Kompetensi KPPN dan Persepsi Keberhasilan Pelaksanaan Penganggaran Berbasis Kinerja Satuan Kerja Kementrian/ Lembaga. Tesis. Universitas Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Riantiarno dan Azlina. 2011. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, Studi pada SKPD Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. Pekbis Jurnal Vol.3, No.3, Hal 560-568.

Ridha, M. Arsyadi. 2012. Pengaruh Tekanan Eksternal, Ketidakpastian Lingkungan, dan Komitmen Managemen terhadap Penerapan Transparansi Pelaporan Keuangan. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Turner, Mark and Hulme, David. 1997. Governance, Administration and Development: Making the State Work, London : MacMillan Press Ltd.

Windayani, S. 2008. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Penggunaan Informasi Kinerja dalam Penganggaran. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol.2, No.1, Hal 9-28.

Wisnu, H. R. S. 2007. Persepsi Stakeholders terhadap Kriteria Akuntabilitas Keuangan dan Transparansi pada Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Wijaya, A. C. H., dan R. Akbar. 2012. The Influences of Information, Goals and Objectives of Organization, and External Pressures towards the Use of Performance Measurement System in Public Sectors. Asia-America-AfricaAustralia (A4).

Willoughby, K.G. dan J.E. Melkers. 2000. Implementing PBB (Performance Based Budgeting) : Conflicting View Succes. Public Budgeting and Finance. Vol.20. 105-120.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v18i1.98

Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi
ISSN : 2685-1415 (Online) | 1410-8224 (Print)
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Akademi Akuntansi YKPN Yogyakarta.
Jl. Gagak Rimang No. 2-4 Balapan, Kotak Pos 6417 YKGK 
Phone (0274) 560159, 562317, 513413, 563516 Fax. (0274) 561591 
Yogyakarta 55222

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.