KONFLIK KEHARUSAN AKUNTABILITAS DAN KINERJA KERJA NGO DI INDONESIA
Abstract
This research investigated the impact of konflik keharusan akuntabilitasin public setor organization, especially for Non Govermental Organization (NGO). Its provided empirical evidence on the impact factors determined the konflik keharusan akuntabilitasof work performance NGOs accountability actor in Indonesia. The objectives of research is to identify different types of accountability requirements with quantitative data and to determine that the competing pressures of accountability affect NGO’s perceived work performance. The results showed that work performance NGO’s accountability actor in Indonesia partly influenced by a negative perceived work context that is workload and job tension.
Keywords: competing accountability requirement, competing accountability, NGO, work performance
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amstrong, M. (2004). Performance management. Setiawan, T. (alih Bahasa). Tugu Publisher. Yogyakarta. Beehr, T.A., & Newman, J. (1978). Job stress, employee health, and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model and literatur review. Personnel Psychology, (31), 665-669.
Brown, L. D., Moore, M. H., & Honan, J. (2001). Building strategic accountability systems for international NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 569-587.
Chin, W., Mancolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least square latent variabel modelling aproach for measuring interaction effects: result from amonte carlo simulayion and voice mail emotion/adoption study information system reseach.
Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 195-209.
Dicke, C. (2002). Ensuring accountability in human service contracting. Public Pruductivity & Management Review, 22: 502-516.
Dixon, Rob, John Ritchie, and Juliana Siwale (2006). Microfinance: accountability from the grassroots. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. Vol.19, No.3. pp.405-427.
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for Northern and Southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191-212.
Fredericksen, P. J., & Levin, D. (2004). Accountability and the use of volunteer officers in public safety organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 27(4), 118-143.
Fry, R. E. (1995). Accountability in organizational life: Problem or opportunity for nonprofits? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(2), 181-195.
Gibelman, M., dan Gelman, S. R. (2001). Very public scandals: Non Governmental Organizations in trouble. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 12(1), 49– 66.
Greenlee, J. S. (1998). Accountability in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(2), 205-210.
Johnston, J. M., & Romzek, B. S. (1999). Contracting and accountability in state medical reform: Rhetoric, theories, and realities. Public Administration Review, 59(5), 383-399.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 7. pp. 11-26.
Handoko T.H. (1996). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Hansen, J. R., & Host, V. (2012). Understanding the relationship between decentralization organizational decesion structure, job context, and job satisfaction-a survey of dining public managers. Review of Public Personel Administration. 132 (2): 288-308.
Hartono, Jogiyanto dan Abdillah Willy. 2010. Konsep dan Aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) untuk Penelitian Empiris. BPFE Yogyakarta
Hartono, Jogiyanto. 2011. Konsep dan Aplikasi Structural Equation Modeling Berbasiskan Varian dalam Penelitian Bisnis. STIM YKPN Yogyakarta
Kanter, R. M., & Summers, D. V. (1987). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for multiple-constituency approach. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 154-166). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kearns, K. P. (1994). The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: An analytical framework. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 185-192.
Kim, S. E. (2005). Balancing competing accountability requirements: Challenges in performance improvement of the nonprofit human service agency. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(2), 145163.
Kim, S.E., & Lee (2010). Impact of competing accountability requirements on perceived work performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(1), 100-118.
Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenges of “multiple accountabilities disorder.†Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94-105.
Lai, Ming-Cheng and Fan, Shih-Liang. 2008. Use of Fit Perception in Employee
Behavioral Criteria in Taiwan IT Industry. Business and Information. Volume 5, Issue 1. Available also at, http://academic-papers.org/ocs2/ session/Papers/A2/234.doc
Light, P. C. (2000). Making nonprofits work: A report on the tides of nonprofit management reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Lusch, R. F., & Serpkenci, R.R. (1990). Personal differences, job tension, job outcomes, and store performance: A study of retail store manager. Journal of Marketing, 85-101.
Lyons, T. F. (1971). Role clarity, need for clarity, satisfaction, tension, and withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 99-110.
Radin, B. A. (2002). The accountable juggler: The art of leadership in a federal agency. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227-238.
Romzek, B. S., & Ingraham, P. W. (2000). Cross pressures of accountability: Initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown Plane crash. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 240253.
Rubin, H. (1990). Dimensions of institutional ethics: A framework for interpreting the ethical context of the nonprofit sector. In D. Gies, S. Ott, & J. M. Shafritz (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: Essential readings (pp. 211-216). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The state of nonprofit america. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for Hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressor and strains: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, workload and physical symptoms inventory: Journal of Occupational Health Pshcology. 3, 356-367.
Vinzi, V. Esposito, Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H.2010. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics
Wang, Xiahou. 2002. Assesing Performance Measurement Impact: A study of US Local Government. Public Performance and Management Review. Sage Publications Vol. 26: 26-43
Wolf, J. (1990). Managing change in nonprofit organizations. In D. L. Gies, J. S. Ott, & J. M. Shafritz (Eds.), The nonprofit organization: Essential readings (pp. 241-257). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v17i2.96
Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi
ISSN : 2685-1415 (Online) | 1410-8224 (Print)
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Politeknik YKPN Yogyakarta.
Jl. Gagak Rimang No. 2-4 Balapan, Yogyakarta 55222
Phone (0274) 560159, 562317, 513413, 563516 Fax. (0274) 561591
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.