MONITORING MECHANISM DAN CREATED SHAREHOLDER VALUE PERUSAHAAN PUBLIK DI INDONESIA

Sutaryo .

Abstract


This study investigates the influence of corporate control mechanisms on the created shareholder value in publicly traded companies in Indonesia. The oversight mechanisms tested in this study are internal monitoring mechanism and external monitoring mechanisms. This study found that the mechanism of both internal and external oversight affects the created shareholder value of companies in Indonesia. These results indicate that corporate governance is a mechanism run by a company in Indonesia to increase shareholder value. Thus, investors and other users of financial statement information can use this monitoring mechanism in economic decision-making in order to optimize the goals of the decision.
Keywords: corporate control, created shareholder value, internal monitoring, external monitoring.


Full Text:

PDF

References


ABott, L, et al. 2003. The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fee. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (22) 2.

Antle, R., dan Nalcbuff, B., 1991. Conservatism and Auditor Client Negotiation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, pp; 31-54.

Bernhart, S.W., dan Rosenstein S. 1998. Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: an Empirical Analysis. Financial Review, (33): 1-16.

Black, B., Jang, H. dan Kim, W. 2003 Does Corporate Governance Affect Firm Value? Evidence From Korea. Stanford Law School J.M Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No.237.

Bradbury, M., E., Mak, Y., T., dan Tan, S., M. 2004. Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals. Available in http:/www.ssrn.com.

Carcello, J. V., dan T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Dismissals Following New Going Concern Reports. The Accounting Review 78 (1): 95-117.

Chen, A., Jong-Ren, C., dan Lanfeng, K. 2004. The Agency Problem, Firm Performance and Monitoring Mechanism: The Evidence From Colleralized Share in Taiwan. Journal Compilation,

Blackwell Publishing. 12 (3): 389-402.

Choi, J. J., Sae, W. P., dan Sean, S. Y. 2007. The Value of Outside Directors: Evidence from Corporate Governance Reform From Korea. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Forthcoming.

Dechow, Patricia M., R.G. Sloan, dan A.P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulaton: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by The SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13, 1-36.

Dharmapala, Dhammika. dan Khanna, Vikramaditya. 2008. Corporate Governance, Enforcement, and Firm Value: Evidence from India. Available in http:/www.ssrn.com.

Dye, R. A. 1991. Informationally Motivated Auditor Replacement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14: 347-374.

Fernandez, Pablo.2001. A Definition of Shareholder Value Creation. IESE Business School. Camino del Cerro del Aguila 3: 1-10.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi Ketiga. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Herbert, Peter dan Victor Dulewicz. 2004. Does The Compotition and Practice of Board Director Beer any Relationship to The Performance of Their Companies. Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing. 12 (3): 263-380.

Jensen, M., dan Meckling W. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.

Kalbers, L.P. dan Forgarty, T.J. 1993. Audit Committee Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation of the Contribution of Power. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12, Spring: 24-49.

Jiambalvo, J., Rajgopal, S., dan Venkatachalam, M. 2002. Institutional Ownership and The Extent to Which Stock Prices Reflect Future Earnings, Contemporary Accounting Research, 19: 11745.

Kim, Yangmi. 2005. Board Network Characteristics and Firm Performance in Korea. Journal compilation, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 13(6): 800-808.

Klaper, L. dan I. Love. 2003. Corporate Governance, Investor Protection and Performance in Emerging Markets. working paper, word bank.

Klein, A. 2002. Audit Committee, Board of Directors Characteristics and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 33:375-400.

Koladkiewicz, Izabela. 2002. The Institutional Shareholders-Best Practice: The National Funds Experience. Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing 10 (3): 187-192.

Lemmon, L.M., and K.V. Lins. 2003. Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Firm Value: Evidence from The East Asian Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance. 17 ( 4).

Li, Jeane dan Kam, L., Chan. 2008. Audit Committee and Firm Value: Evidence on Outside Top Exceutive As Experts-Independent Directors. Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing. 16 (1): 1631.

McKinsey and Company. 2002. Investor Opinion Survey on Corporate Governance. London: McKinsey and Company.

Nicholson, Gavin, J., dan Geoffrey, J., Keil. 2003. Board Compotition and Corporate Performace: How The The Australian Experience Informs Constransting Theorities of Corporate Governance. Journal Compilation, Blackwell Publishing. 11 (3): 189-205.

Prowson, S. 1999. Corporate Governance in East Asia: A Framework for Analysis, ESCAP, http:// www.unescap.org/drpad/publication/dp20_19 3/dp_20.

Raghunandan, K., dan D., Rama. 2007. Determinants of Audit Committee Diligence. Accounting Horizons 21 (3): 265-297.

Sekaran, U. 2003. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New York: Wiley.

Sharma, Vineeta., Vic Naiker., dan Barry Lee .2009. Determinants of Audit Committee Meeting Frequency: Evidence from A Voluntary Govenance System. Accounting Horizons. 23 (3): 245-263.

Shleifer, A., dan R. W., Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance. 52 (2): 737-783.

Smith, M.P. 1996. Shareholder Activism By Institutional Investors: Evidence From CalPERS. The Journal of Finance. 55 (1): 227-252.

Ujiyantho, Muh., Arief dan Bambang Agus P. 2007. Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Manajemen Laba dan Kinerja Keuangan (Studi pada Perusahaan Go Publik Sektor Manufaktur). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) X. Makasar.

Vafeas, N. (2000). Board Structure and The Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 139–160.

Wahidawati. 2001. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Kepemilikan Institusional pada Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan: Sebuah Perspektif Agency Theory. Simposium Akuntansi Nasional (SNA) IV. Surabaya.

Watts, R., dan J., Zimmarmen.1996. Positive Accounting Theory. Engleword. Cliffs. N. J. Prentice hall press.

Warfield T., J.J dan K. Wild. 1995. Managerial Ownership Accounting Choise, and Information of Earning. Journal of accounting and economics. 20 (1)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35591/wahana.v16i1.72

Wahana: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi
ISSN : 2685-1415 (Online) | 1410-8224 (Print)
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Akademi Akuntansi YKPN Yogyakarta.
Jl. Gagak Rimang No. 2-4 Balapan, Kotak Pos 6417 YKGK 
Phone (0274) 560159, 562317, 513413, 563516 Fax. (0274) 561591 
Yogyakarta 55222

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.